8/26/2023 0 Comments Lost masterpiece of pornography![]() Go check it out at and see what you think. It's got a really funny angle when it comes to the boundaries of preservation and what kind of things should be preserved, and in that aspect, I think this film is absolutely hilarious. June Crenshaw (Kristen Bell) was known as the ‘sex kitten’ of the Supreme Court. Despite this, I think Lost Masterpieces in Pornography is vastly underappreciated. This lost masterpiece of pornography was recently discovered in a woodworking shop of a Beverly Hills dentist. Now, that being said, it probably could have leaned a bit more into that corny territory and played a lot more with the comedic opportunities it had, and the sound is WAY too tinny even for an old film, which took me out of the experience for the majority of the short. I thought that angle was absolutely creative and hilarious, and I loved some of the little touches that are thrown in, such as someone softly bringing a fan down to the floor instead of letting it drop. This film pokes fun at some of the absurdities that sometimes come out of archiving strange artifacts like old porn films, and I LOVED how it did that, with Ricky Jay acting as a preservation-like host guiding us through the fact that this fragment was found and is seen as a lost masterpiece. ![]() I mean, heck, even today's porn could be seen as historical artifacts in the future, as weird as that is to think about. It's not technically necessary to preserve most porn films, since most porn films haven't had a huge impact on our society, but there are definitely arguments to be made for some older films like this. There are some things that I think should be completely destroyed and never witnessed, yes, but the line can certainly become blurry when it comes to certain boundaries. See, I mentioned in some of my previous reviews that I'm a wannabe archivist, and I love the idea of things being preserved for future generations. However, what really struck me about this film was the archival aspect of it. Hopefully, she was comfortable, and if she was, she's got guts for doing a role like this. Do they hate it for its content? Maybe, but I still think this film is respectful of the actors involved, and I would like to think that Kristen Bell wouldn't take a role like this unless she was comfortable. June Crenshaw (Kristen Bell) was known as the 'sex kitten' of the Supreme Court. It's spoofing old porn films with a terrible budget at their disposal, being corny is probably the best compliment I can give this short. JDavid Mamet's 'Lost Masterpieces of Pornography' w/ Kristen Bell, Ed O'Neill & Ricky Jay This lost masterpiece of pornography was recently discovered in a woodworking shop of a Beverly Hills dentist. Is it because it's campy? Maybe, but that's the whole point of this short. I honestly don't get why people seem to be so lukewarm on this short, possibly even hating it. David Mamet?! What the heck is he doing here? Whatever compelled him to write this short, I don't care because I think it's pretty darn entertaining. a weird thing to review, huh? But you know what, I've been on a streak of Letterboxd reviews for over a week now, I have other things I have to do tonight, and I didn't want to break that streak, so here we are, reviewing this random short film by. Information herein is provided on an "as is" or "as available" basis we make no warranty of any kind to you regarding the information provided and disclaim any liability for damages from use of the blog or its content.Yeah, this is. If you believe that some content is inaccurate, false, disparaging, slanderous, libelous, or defamatory, please post a comment or contact me I will consider editing existing content, removing that content, or posting a retraction. The author apologizes for any factual or other errors in this blog. The legal information provided in this blog is general and should not be relied on as legal advice, which I cannot provide without full consideration of all relevant information relating to one’s individual situation. Readers should not act upon any information presented on this blog without seeking professional legal counsel. Further, your use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. It does not constitute legal advice, and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. This blog is for informational and educational purposes only. genetic information discrimination (18).family responsibility discrimination (39).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |